Human Resource Climate and Faculty Retention: Evidences from Institutions of Higher Education in Northern India
Loading...
Date
Authors
Supervisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
This study investigates the role of Human Resource (HR) Climate in shaping faculty
retention within higher educational institutions (Central, State, Private and Deemed to be
Universities) across Northern India. Data was collected from 770 faculty members across
Punjab, Haryana, Delhi, and Chandigarh, selected from the top 100 universities in these states
as per NIRF rankings, with final participation based on institutional and individual consent.,
the research aims to (1) examine and compare the HR Climate of different types of higher
education institutions, (2) assess the influence of HR Climate and Individual Factors on
faculty retention, and (3) explore the mediating roles of Organizational Trust, Organizational
Commitment, and Job Satisfaction in this relationship.
The study adopts a two-phase quantitative methodology. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA)
on an initial sample of 300 faculty members identified five key sub-dimensions of HR
Climate: Senior Support, Peer Support, Research Environment, Rewards, and Task
Environment. Subsequently, Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM)
was employed on a sample of 470 to validate the measurement and structural models and test
hypothesized relationships among variables. Additionally, the entire sample was used for
comparing HR Climate perceptions across institution types using ANOVA. A self-designed
questionnaire was used to measure HR Climate, while standardized and validated instruments
from existing literature were adopted to assess Individual Factors, Organizational Trust,
Commitment, Job Satisfaction, and Faculty Retention.
Findings reveal that faculty in central and state universities perceive a significantly more
positive HR Climate than their counterparts in private institutions. However, no significant
differences emerged between central, state, and deemed-to-be universities in overall HR
Climate perception, fulfilling the first objective. Structural model results confirmed that HR
Climate has a strong and positive impact on faculty retention, job satisfaction, organizational
commitment, and trust. Interestingly, Individual Factors—such as work life balance and
availability of alternate job opportunities—do not directly influence faculty retention,
showing a non-significant path coefficient. However, they significantly contribute to job
satisfaction, commitment, and trust, which in turn strongly influence retention, thereby
fulfilling the second objective.
6
Mediation analysis provided further insights. The relationship between HR Climate and
Faculty Retention is partially mediated by job satisfaction, commitment, and
trust—indicating complementary partial mediation. In contrast, the relationship between
Individual Factors and Faculty Retention is fully mediated through these three variables,
highlighting their critical indirect role in retention decisions. These results underscore the
importance of positive psychological states in translating individual and organizational
dynamics into long-term faculty engagement, achieving the third objective.
This research significantly advances the understanding of faculty retention through the lens of
Organizational Support Theory (OST) by positioning HR Climate as a central contextual
variable that shapes perceptions of organizational support. The study offers practical
implications for educational administrators, particularly in private universities, where faculty
perceive HR practices as comparatively less favourable. Institutions aiming to enhance
retention must focus on building a supportive HR Climate, fostering research culture,
developing transparent reward systems, and strengthening faculty experiences through job
satisfaction, trust, and commitment. The establishment of dedicated HR departments in
private universities is recommended to institutionalize such practices, which are essential for
sustaining talent, improving academic outcomes, and achieving long-term institutional
success.
