Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Concrete and Steel as Construction Material

dc.contributor.authorPundir, Satish Singh
dc.contributor.supervisorSiddique, Rafat
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-28T12:35:44Z
dc.date.available2014-10-28T12:35:44Z
dc.date.issued2014-10-28T12:35:44Z
dc.descriptionME, CED, Dissertationen
dc.description.abstractConcrete and Steel is one of the most widely used construction materials. The demand for concrete and steel as a construction material is ever-growing. The construction industry accounts for almost 75% of total raw material used. This is an obvious drain on natural resources and has a major impact on the surrounding environment. Construction materials are also responsible for a relatively large portion of the global CO2 emissions. The commercial construction industry is dominated by the use of steel and in-situ concrete as building materials. It is intuitive then, to state that these two materials and their respective production flows have a significant impact on the environment, simply because of the amount of material being produced and consumed in the building industry today. In addition, due to drastic increases in energy prices and potential shortages in the future, the amount of energy consumed in the production of construction materials (embodied energy) and the amount of energy used over a projected life span (operational energy) are becoming increasingly more important to builders, designers, and owners of buildings. The growing trend in the India, and elsewhere in the world, is towards eco-friendly design. In the last several years, the concrete and steel industries have spent significant resources to promote their material as the optimum solution for sustainable building design. Because natural resource consumption, air emissions, and the amount of embodied energy are all important drivers for the push towards sustainability, this study will compare those factors and quantify the differences between what is necessary for the construction of concrete- and steel-frame structures. The purpose of this thesis is to utilize the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) method to compare the environmental impacts created by the steel and concrete construction industry at the lowest common performance level, in this case the structural shell of a typical building in a given geographical area. The study will include all major product systems and material flows involved with concrete or steel construction and quantify their impacts in terms of total energy requirement, natural resources consumed, and harmful air emissions, specifically as they relate to global warming potential.en
dc.description.sponsorshipCED, Thapar University, Patialaen
dc.format.extent2146791 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10266/3269
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.subjectLife cycleen
dc.subjectassesmenten
dc.subjectconcreteen
dc.subjectsteelen
dc.subjectcivil engineeringen
dc.titleComparative Life Cycle Assessment of Concrete and Steel as Construction Materialen
dc.typeThesisen

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
3269.pdf
Size:
2.05 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.79 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: